The Invisibility of Modern Sexism (Final Draft)

Dear Modern Sexist of America,

In this letter I will attempt to propose a theory that comes mainly from my own experience as a woman in modern society, in a town that I believe falsely claims a "liberal" and "progressive" point of view. My theory is that, for reasons that I will explain further in this letter, sexism is the most "invisible" of the main three "isms" that are being discussed more and more often among those of us that are concerned with civil rights. The main reason that I believe that sexism goes unnoticed in relation to that of racism or homophobia is simple, but difficult to prove: intuitively, we can surmise that sexism may be the oldest form of biologically based oppression. What I mean to say by "biologically based oppression" is that it is oppression that is based upon aspects of a person that either can not be changed or can not be changed easily.

Throughout most cultures women have been viewed as the weaker sex. Indeed, women generally have less physical strength than that of the average male. In a time before technological advances were made, physical strength was certainly important, to fight off animals as well as human predators. However, it seems bizarre to me that this "weaker sex" point of view has prevailed, even after humans moved indoors, invented high powered weapons, and began to use physical violence less and less frequently to "solve" each conflict that arose.

The main aspect of subtle or indirect sexism that I've noticed is displayed often in commercials, and frequently in a way that demeans men as well, albeit to a lesser extent that perhaps is less inherently damaging. For example, most commercials that involve any type of cleaning solution or domestic work of any kind feature a woman and are therefore presumed to be aimed at female consumers. In these commercials men are portrayed as lazy, filthy, and immature due to their alleged inability to take care of themselves. I feel that this recurrent theme in commercials and in popular media is especially damaging to children of both genders (and those genders that lie in between male and female). It shows them that no matter which parent is working (if it is even only one parent; this is becoming less and less commonplace) mom cleans up, while dad relaxes. In a world where more people need house mates and at later points in life, I believe that this early exposure to traditional gender roles can cause strife and discord. In Santa Cruz especially, the cost of rent is high. Therefore, the average college student has had a lot of housemates. Renters are often replaced due to conflict. How is this relevant? The answer is that the problem usually has to do with someone refusing to clean up after themselves, and the culprit is usually male. Years of watching his mother and mothers on television pick up after sons and fathers may indeed have a long lasting impact.

There are many people like yourself who would have us believe that sexism is no longer an issue. To be blunt, these people are usually male and therefore have little to no experience with the kind of sexism that women often experience. According to an article in AIDS Education & Prevention "[in our sample] more than two thirds reported having ever experienced unfair treatment as a woman". Clearly this is an indicator of a problem that is still relevant to modern society, as this survey was conducted in 2011. I implore you to do your own research regarding sexist attitudes towards more than half of the population, as well as to simply be more observant of your behavior and the behavior of those around you. It is obviously a bizarre state of affairs when a group that is in no way a minority is treated as if they are one. It is wise to assume that even if you are not female, that the equal treatment of women will only serve you, since it would reduce the incidence of anger in these women, making it easier to improve your relationship with them. 

Sincerely,
Rachel Meisenheimer  

The Invisibility of Modern Sexism (Draft 2)

In this letter I will attempt to propose a theory that comes mainly from my own experience as a woman in modern society, in a town that I believe falsely claims a "liberal" and "progressive" point of view. My theory is that, for reasons that I will explain further in this letter, sexism is the most "invisible" of the main three "isms" that are being discussed more and more often among those of us that are concerned with civil rights. The main reason that I believe that sexism goes unnoticed in relation to that of racism or homophobia is simple, but difficult to prove: intuitively, we can surmise that sexism may be the oldest form of biologically based oppression. What I mean to say by "biologically based oppression" is that it is oppression that is based on aspects of a person that either can not be changed or can not be changed easily.

Throughout most cultures women have been viewed as the weaker sex. Indeed, women generally have less physical strength than that of the average male. In a time before technological advances were made, physical strength was certainly important, to fight off animals as well as human predators. However, it seems bizarre to me that this "weaker sex" view has prevailed after humans moved indoors, invented high powered weapons, and began to use physical violence less and less often to "solve"each conflict that arose.

The main aspect of subtle or indirect sexism that I've noticed is displayed often in commercials, and frequently in a way that demeans men as well, albeit to a lesser extent that perhaps is less inherently damaging. For example, most commercials that involve any type of cleaning solution or domestic work of any kind feature a woman and are therefore presumed to be aimed at female consumers. In these commercials men are portrayed as lazy, filthy, and immature due to their alleged inability to take care of themselves. This recurrent theme in commercials and in popular media is especially damaging to children of both genders (and those genders that lie in between male and female). It shows them that no matter which parent is working (if it is even only one parent; this is becoming less and less commonplace) mom cleans up, while dad relaxes. In a world where more people need house mates and at later points in life, I believe that this early exposure to traditional gender roles can cause strife and discord. In Santa Cruz especially, the cost of rent is high. Therefore, the average college student has had a lot of housemates. Renters are often replaced due to conflict. How is this relevant? The answer is that the problem usually has to do with someone refusing to clean up after themselves, and the culprit is usually male. Years of watching his mother and mothers on television pick up after sons and fathers may indeed have a long lasting impact.

There are many people who would have us believe that sexism is no longer an issue. To be blunt, these people are usually male and therefore have little to no experience with the kind of sexism that women often experience. According to an article in AIDS Education & Prevention "[in our sample] more than two thirds reported having ever experienced unfair treatment as a woman". Clearly this is an indicator of a problem that is still relevant to modern society, as this survey was conducted in 2011. 

The Invisibility of Modern Sexism (Rough Draft 1)

In this letter I will attempt to propose a theory that comes mainly from my own experience as a woman in modern society, in a town that I believe falsely claims a "liberal" and "progressive" point of view. My theory is that, for reasons that I will explain further in this letter, sexism is the most "invisible" of the main three "isms" that are being discussed more and more often among those of us that are concerned with civil rights.The main reason that I believe that sexism goes unnoticed in relation to that of racism or homophobia is simple, but difficult to prove: intuitively, we can surmise that sexism may be the oldest form of biologically based oppression. What I mean to say by "biologically based oppression" is that it is oppression that is based on aspects of a person that either can not be changed or can not be changed easily.

Throughout most cultures women have been viewed as the weaker sex. Indeed, women generally have less physical strength than the average male. In a time before technological advances were made, physical strength was certainly important, to fight off animals as well as human predators. However, it seems bizarre to me that this "weaker sex" view has prevailed after humans moved indoors, invented high powered weapons, and began to use physical violence less and less often to "solve"each conflict that arose.

The main aspect of subtle or indirect sexism that I've noticed is displayed often in commercials, and frequently in a way that demeans men as well, albeit to a lesser extent that perhaps is less inherently damaging. For example, most commercials that involve any type of cleaning solution or domestic work of any kind feature a woman and are aimed at female consumers. In these commercials men are portrayed as lazy, filthy, and immature due to their alleged inability to take care of themselves. This recurrent theme in commercials and in popular media is especially damaging to children of both genders (and those genders who lie in between). It shows them that no matter which parent is working (if it is even only one parent; this is becoming less and less commonplace) mom cleans up, while dad relaxes. In a world where more people need house mates and at later points in life, this early exposure to gender roles can cause strife and discord. In Santa Cruz especially, the cost of rent is high. Therefore, the average college student has had a lot of housemates. Renters are often replaced due to conflict. How is this relevant? The answer is that the problem usually has to do with someone refusing to clean up after themselves, and the culprit is usually male. Years of watching his mother and mothers on television pick up after sons and fathers may indeed have a long lasting impact.

Annotated Bibliography

Mills, Sara. Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. EBSCOHost EBook

             Collection. Web. 29 Apr. 2013.

Sara Mills examines the prevalence of sexism that is expressed through modern language. A distinction is made between "overt" sexism and "indirect" sexism. Overtly sexist language occurs when a word is used or a statement is made that is intentionally sexist and oftentimes abusive in nature. Indirect sexism in language occurs when the words or statements made are more "vague". Mills also covers topics that occur when viewing language intellectually, such as common stereotypes, context, hate speech, and ways in which one can challenge sexist language.

MacKinnon, Catharine A. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1993. Print.

Catharine MacKinnon argues that the oppression of women is not imaginary and that language is what our most basest interactions rely upon. She asserts that the first amendment protects the perpetrators of discriminatory acts, specifically that of pornographic film makers, stating essentially that the creators of such films are rapists.